I think 16 houseguests is too much for Big Brother and that they should revert back to 13 or 14.
In my opinion, starting with 16 players encourages two things:
a) house alliances
b) the "it's too early" mentality, first shown, and inadvertently taken herself out by, Helen
Plus keeping Groddys hamsters in the house for 90+ days is way too long and the season usually gets really dull by the end. #bb16
I agree but with the twist they now get what they want
Late into the season and majority of the people left are game players and its up in the air on where people stand
Yes i kinda agree patrick319 .. In italy alliances are forbidden (Here BB lasts like 5/6 months and we have about 30 partecipants) .. I think ITs more fair this way.. And blindfolds burn much more when the alliance is "silent" lol
I actually think that the "house alliance" is more a factor of the game and its players evolving. I really think the same thing would happen in a 13 or 14 person game.
More hgs equals more double evictions. sorry id rather have two double eviction episodes than not. Bigger house equals more game to be played its better
yoo ive been thinking this for months! With BB15 and BB16 I lost interest in the last like 5 weeks because it just drags. Maybe if we had a really good cast a 13 week game would be fun, but it hasn't happened. If they had 16 HGS in a 10 week schedule like BB14, it would be interesting too, because they could add surprise evictions early on to put them in game mode.
