let me make a disclaimer cause I know what her response will be: I AM NOT IN THE OC, I LEFT, LIKE.. 2 YEARS AGO OR SOMETHING.
1. There were two OC in that stars. Brandonpinzu & Kentuckyy. Two people is not a premade. Two people is not enough to get majority.
2. Zeptis has been one of my best friends for about 2 years, and he has NEVER been OC. Even when I was OC, he was never in the OC. Ever. We all thought he was hella annoying. No one even wanted him added to calls, much less added to our alliance.
3. You did absolutely nothing in that entire game other than whine, complain, and act like the victim in the public chat. Let me remind you that YOU are the one who publically said who you wanted to nom, further excluding people THAT COULD HAVE HELPED YOU..
4. You winning and not Zack, someone who went UNNOMINATED, is a total sham. Someone going unnominated deserves to win 100% more than someone who whined and ostracized themselves for the sake of "playing the victim".
5. You didn't "get the OC again," because, as stated, there were 2 OC in the game. Please put on your reading glasses and get a fucking clue.
I would agree that the OC thing is retarded. But regardless if Zeptis was OC or not he has been considered OC by the public since at least the stars I played with him.
Now although I did vote for Zack because he went unnommed, I don't agree that everyone who goes unnommed deserves it 100%. There are 2 types of people who don't
1. People who go unnommed because everyone knows they won't win
2. People who flavor the shit out of someone knowing the consequences a.k.a Zack
Survivor8, as far as I know, Zeptis has always told people he wasn't OC.
And sure, but in the same argument, Gagaluv did not deserve to win because if you look at the public game chat (I actually read some of it,) she publically said who she wanted to nom. Even putting people in categories "The people left unnominated", so shes legit excluding an ENTIRE group from working with her by doing that..
Most of ppl vote for popularity, not for the game play tho.. Amf aka andy made a blog about that.
And gagaluv is popular enough to win Stars against anybody on tg
I replied to you sjsoccer88... I will reply when all someone does is complain and then spam chats to get their blog to top blogs!! The whole thing has no affect on her or her life...
minie - don't remember that at all, so maybe I wasnt around then or paying attention to stars, but I think unnominated people always deserve to win.
jenna2010 - I like you and all, but I didn't really spam the shit out of this blog to get to top blog, lol. And I know for a fact that people care about this, so thats just a redundant statement. Just because you don't care because your friend won doesn't mean "nobody cares". I didn't know I wasn't allowed to blog what I wanted to blog about when I wanted to blog about it, oh wait, I can.
ShayyBayy, where did I say you couldn't blog what you wanted? Exactly, I didn't!! I like you as well but it seems to me more disagree with your blog than agree... Just because the OC or your group get bent about something doesn't mean all of tengaged does... She is my Aunt in real life, that there is so much more than a friend... Tbh I don't care who wins any given stars...
Okay since my name is brought into this I think I will have to have a say in this lol. ShayyBayy I dont know what happened in your stars but I can say that even if a person goes unnomed does not mean that they deserve to win over everyone in the stars cast. I know that most people who really "play" stars knows that it is hard to go unnomed, however with every cast there is a new way to play the game. I say that because I have played the game several times.
You guys may think that gagaluv didnt deserve to win, but not only do you have to work the stars cast when playing the game, but you have to work tengaged as well, because they are the ones that will be voting. I learned this lesson from HelenCoops in my first stars. You have to pay attention to what tengaged says because they also play a big impact in the game.
Minie it was like a month ago lol :P and my game moves regarding him going unnomed was thoroughly thought out and that is what I thought was best for my game. Many people who I have explained to as to why he went unnomed understood and agreed that it was a good move. Although, I will admit that eyoomarcus played a good game and deserved to be in finals and that is why I decided to let him go unnomed... well that was one of the many reasons.
clueliz although I do agree that the perfect stars game requires a combonation of gameplay and public awareness, I would have to argue that having too much of one And almost none of the other is not deserving of a win. In the example of gagaluv she worked the public fantastically, conversely she did virtually nothing when it comes to gameplay. And before you try to say I am biased, the same can be said about kentuckyy's gameplay. His gameplay was flawless but he lacked any public interaction. But I feel a lack of gameplay (gagaluv) is a lot less deserving of a win than a lack of public manipulation (Kentucky).v.dickey@sbcglobal.net So really no one in that game deserved to win, not even me, but I just feel zack deserved it a little more.
Zeptis I agree that there does have to be a balance. I couldnt have worded it better myself. I do have to say that sometimes you can be in stars and not know the game play of someone, while other members of the stars cast can be obvious. I can explain this in detail, but it has a lot to do with game play and if you are a player that shows all your moves or one that flies under the radar. I dont know what kind of game play that gagaluv played or anyone in that stars, because I didnt watch that game in detail and really, u mainly know some/most of what goes on if u are in the game :) Thanks for the insight about the game. I have enjoyed reading ur take on it.