Parvati had a shit social game. She openly mocked the Heroes, who made up most of the jury, while Sandra continuously tried working with them and ended on good terms with all of them.
why would anyone give someone who blatantly made fun of them over someone who did nothing but try and help them? it's basic logic and if you don't understand that, you dont understand how Survivor works.
DumbGinger That doesn't change the fact that Parvati outwitted & outplayed Sandra & that sandra's gameplay will never be as great as Parvati's. I know WHY she won. & you said it yourself, she was nicer. But Parvati was better. & that's never gonna change! & don't tell me out-socializing is more rewarding than outwitting & outplaying
Skyler_TW It doesn't matter what's more "rewarding". nothing matters in Survivor except A) ability to get to the end and B) the ability to get jurors to want to give you money more than the people next to you.
Jeff Probst has never told the jurors "alright guys, vote for who played the best" or "ok, time to vote for whoever manipulated and blindsided the most!". The jury gives a win to who they respect the most. If the jury handed over the win to a person over another person, their gameplay is better. There's no way you can argue against it. You can try and make a case that someone who DIDN'T make FTC played a better game than the winner (such as David playing better than Adam), but it's impossible for a losing finalist to be better than the winner.
DumbGinger Again, that doesn't change the fact that Parvati runs laps around Sandra in terms of gameplay. She does & it's true. She's the real "Queen" of Survivor whether you like it or not (:
& you know the jury system is flawed right? That's why people like Casey Anthony & other people who should be sentenced to jail get off free. Your logic is the jury is never wrong, so I can't argue against it? So you agree every winner of survivor & Big Brother deserved it no matter what because they had the jury support? Lol & do you believe that w/ actual jury cases aswell? LOL, that's exactly why it's flawed because it's a matter of opinion/bias.
& I'm not sure why you're speaking from a juror's perspective anyway. You weren't in the game & you weren't on jury so you can't build your case that she deserved to win because jury liked her more. You're a viewer so get a viewer's perspective please. Obviously survivor is a social experiment aswell as a game, & we're gonna have strategic winners & social winners. Duh. That doesn't mean it's the best decision. At the end of the day, strategy triumphs social, & losing because you're not liked doesn't make the much less strategic winner better.
Lol you truly don't understand Survivor at all. Im not arguing with someone who has as much understanding of the game as the Facebook moms who think Ozzy and Rupert should be on every season.
DumbGinger lmao, obviously I do. But that response was pretty much what I was expecting back now that I shot you down completely w/ compelling FACTS that can't be counter-argued
Skyler_TW you tried comparing the Survivor jury system to an actual one. Youre a fucking idiot. If you want to stay bitter because you like someone who isn't as good of a player as someone who won twice, feel free. If you want to pretend like you somehow won this meeting to stroke your own ego, go for it. But you do not understand Survivor, this is why your shit blogs are being negged. You're an idiot and people know it.
DumbGinger Not what I did son lol. I tackled what you said & proved why your way of thinking is critically wrong. You may want to reread what I actually wrote because I'm sure someone who can actually decipher wording will agree that my statement is true, whether or not they agree w/ you or I about who's better
Jury = a group of people who look for evidence to decide how to vote.
That's survivor idiot. How can the definition of jury change whether it's for court or to decide who wins a reality game? Where tf you think the idea came fro...
Like DumbGinger said, you're on the same level as the Facebook Moms, at the end of the day whoever wins deserves the win, which Sandra beat Parvati. I don't know how you can even compare the two, Sandra 2/3, Parvati 1/3.
ThePug facebook moms, twitter stans, former players, the host... etc. damn. Looks like y'all's opinions are the minority. I don't need to continue on anymore lmao you're invalid af
#QueenParvati