It's just about time you overhyping fools stop letting your bias opinions control your critical thoughts. You have to stop these claims that she somehow earned her win over the 2 people who controlled the game start to finish.
Russell & Parvati run laps around Sandra in terms of gameplay & it's about time you got that. 2 wins isn't going to change that. She ain't in the same league.
& for the ones who compare Sandra & Parvati, & hate on Parv but hype Sandra are hating FOOOOLS. I mean, come on.. You know better
Comments
She only one HvV cuz of a bitter jury. All the heroes voted her because they got played. Courtney was her only real vote.
Have Russell won? No. How many times have Parvati won? 1 Sandra won twice and was the only person to do it. I don't care how you win, a win is a win no matter how you get it. "And the queen stays queen adios"
BadBoyy2699 any former survivor winner could come back at any moment & win again. If Michele or Natalie somehow manage that, it doesn't put them above actual elite players
It does mean that you are superior though because you achieved the point of the game which is being Sole Survivor. Russell has never come close to winning in his three times playing the game while Sandra has done it twice in the same amount of games.
False... You can't tell me all survivor winners OR, & especially, Big Brother winners are superior to those who haven't won. Russell is superior to many winners, as are many other losers. Making final tribal shows superiority enough. You aren't superior for being favored by a jury. Especially when you're undeserving
