This site uses cookies. If you continue to browse the site, we shall assume that you accept the use of cookies.
Big Brother and online Hunger games.

I love arguing with hypocritas that say

Jan 29, 2015 by Timster
if Ozzy won #Survivor SP or if Gary won BBCan1 (which he did in my eyes!) they'd be the worst winner ever because they didn't deserve to win after already being eliminated.

But then in BB16 they wanted Nicole to win and she would deserve her win if she made it to the end.

Naw homie don't back track now. And sure as hell don't say "Well Ozzy & Gary were let back into the game at the final 5" so what? That's still 2-3 more rounds to go through. It's not like they would've been dragged to the final 2 after already losing before, they would've both earned their win especially if the jury respected their game enough to vote them to win over someone who wasn't voted out.

Comments

They all would of been the worst winners IMO

But I sure ozzy and nicole. Gary was fun to watch majority of the time tho
Sent by aiwfwyattroh,Jan 29, 2015
#CompletelyAgreeWithYou

Imo, all three were strong players..just being voted out means and getting back in means they dont deserve it..Ozzy and Nicole fought back, to be back in the game and Gary got voted in because of who he was as a player and how he played. #AllDeservedIt ^.^
Sent by FlamingJojo,Jan 30, 2015
flamingjojo finally someone agrees with me on that. I don't care if they were previously out, if they still play a good enough game to make it to the end and have a better case than the other finalist than they deserve to win just as much. It's really not a big deal to me.
Sent by Timster,Jan 30, 2015
Timster Lolxx not one to me either..especially id say gary because that scandalous fail by Topaz would've got him the game.  But overall, they all would've had great cases, if they reached finals--that is for sure. &.^
Sent by FlamingJojo,Jan 30, 2015

Leave a comment