In Survivor you can easily tell who controlled the game/who played a good UTR strategy etc.
In BB there's only 2 nominees and it's not impossible to go to the end unominated, also if you win a bunch of HOH's POV's it doesn't seem as impressive because it's likely you played against a sucky cast. I feel like a floater who didn't do shit has just as much as a case as someone who won everything.
And when it comes to social game
In Survivor group games you're constantly talking strategy and it you HAVE to have some sort of social game to make it far + tribe swaps + merge forces you to play with everyone, but BB is a very quiet, secluded game. If you're alliance is always in power you don't have to talk to anyone and you can go to the end and end up not having to speak to half of the cast cause it wasn't necessary. idk if that makes sense.
Comments
i like bb games more for the exact reasons you mentioned lmao social play is so boring to me
Yeah but Survivor casts are really shaky, Timster. Like once I got in a 3-3 tie vote TWICE and survived both times (LOL) and I won 4-1-0 in jury, but then a game later I went to the end without being close to getting voted out even once while the two finalists both were (one was safe by one vote three times and the other was saved because of two lucky idols) and I got no jury votes.
yaxha But you kinda have to have a social game unless you kiss the HOH's ass every week.
IDK IT'S JUST WEIRD.
IN SURVIVOR YOUR GOAL IS TO STAY ON MAJORITY SIDE AND GO TO THE FINALS.
IN BB IT'S JUST KISSING HOH'S ASS EVERY WEEK, PRAYING YOU'RE NOT BACKDOORED AND GOING TO THE FINALS.
I FEEL LIKE BB IS A MUCH EASIER GAME TO PLAY AND BOTH FINALISTS DESERVE TO WIN CAUSE THE FORMAT IS SO SHITTY AND DOESN'T SHOW SOMEONE AS A STAND OUT PLAYER UNLIKE SURVIVOR WHERE 90% OF THE TIME THE JURY KNOWS RIGHT AWAY WHO TO VOTE FOR.
THE 1 TIME I WAS A BB JUROR I WAS LIKE "IDK IT LOOKS LIKE Y'ALL PLAYED THE SAME GAME. WON SAME AMOUNT OF COMPS, NEITHER OF YOU SPOKE TO ME. IDC WHO WINS"
