Idea for a game involving a JURY!!!

Comments

maybe!!

Sent by Darren, on October 12, 2008

yeah i always thought that would be a good idea jeff !

Sent by Rodzzz, on October 12, 2008

i love that idea! i hope randomize considers it!

Sent by Bowler23, on October 12, 2008

This is probably the best and most realistic idea for a game yet.  kudos

Sent by IAmPaxton, on October 12, 2008

Thank you so much Paxton!!!!

Sent by jeffypop, on October 12, 2008

Please plus this so it can be seen by Randomize and so he knows people like the idea!

Sent by jeffypop, on October 12, 2008

Thanks for your idea.
I am very interested to know different opinions about it and if we should change actual rookies or maybe as Jeffypop suggests do a different game...

Sent by randomize, on October 12, 2008

Dont change original rookies, just make a whole new game !!!

Sent by jeffypop, on October 12, 2008

That would be awesome. It would be even more like the real BB.

Sent by Renegades, on October 12, 2008

yeah thats kool =)

Sent by azn_dude89, on October 12, 2008

i want that sooo bad

Sent by tennisallstar94, on October 12, 2008

That's a cool idea

Sent by weeman, on October 12, 2008

Awesome idea! I think that a lot of things could definitely be added, the game is great as it is but plenty of potential too :D

Sent by Naomi1988, on October 12, 2008

i love the idea it would be awesome......... i don't actually think people would vote for who played the game the best..... it will prolly be a bunch of sore losers but still good idea :D

Sent by Bubblyangel, on October 12, 2008

Oh yeah, thats true Bubbly..... but thats how real BB is too LOL!

Sent by jeffypop, on October 12, 2008

strongly agree with you ;D

Sent by Braga, on October 12, 2008

omg thats a really good idea!

Sent by Reyem91, on October 12, 2008

I wish this could happen but it couldn't work because:
1. Votes will often go very unfair
2. Many people are not active throughout the game
3. Many people CAN'T be active

Sent by ivshapiro, on October 12, 2008

Exactly. Thats why they get a mail and have 24 hours to vote!!!

Sent by jeffypop, on October 12, 2008

Yeah it's good idea. Plus for those that dont vote the algorithm can pick up the slack. After all the alogrithm picks the final five as it is... it would be nice to see the evicted housemates have a say in who wins. After all they have to wait till the game is over anyway before they can join another one.. AND that's how Big Brother is anyway. :)

Sent by anarcticsin, on October 12, 2008

I'd play it. When people are booted they could list the remaining HG's in order they most want them to win to least want to win so the final 3 wouldn't have to wait 24 hours. If that makes sense.
So let's the house is Betty, Vanna, Curtis, Bradley, and Moochops.
The house evicts Vanna. Vanna puts in the list that she order she wants people to win.
1. Bradley
2. Moochops
3. Betty
4. Curtis
If the house evicted Bradley then her vote would go to Moochops. Get it?

Sent by Elliott, on October 12, 2008

Get it!

Sent by jeffypop, on October 12, 2008

There are advantages and disadvantages to it. It does sound good but most of the jury members won't keep up with the game, and therefore, won't be able to make an educated decision. Ultimately, though, jury voting still needs to be a part of the game somehow; I suggest that half of the winner-determining process is jury voting and half of it comes from the algorithm.

Sent by westcoast, on October 12, 2008

Oh, and Moochops for the win <3

Sent by Elliott, on October 12, 2008

Hasn't this been mentioned SO many times before?? I don't think it would work.
Shouldn't Tengaged just be for Big Brother core-game-type things, ya know?

Sent by Nutmeg, on October 13, 2008

i like the idea..and it actually can be done :)

Sent by Nadiec, on October 13, 2008