People are retarded LOL, there is more to it than just height and weight.
The most important thing is body composition.. A girl could weigh 160 and not even be fat if she works out and has some muscle on her.. (muscle weighs more than fat, so if you lift weights and your body is fit then you can weigh more without being fat or bulky) .. And a girl could weigh 120 and be considered "fat".. like if has a pudgy stomach or legs or idk..
It's all about how your body actually looks and not about the number on the scale.
People need to get educated before labeling a certain weight as automatically "fat", especially people who answered 150 and lower... (I mean those who were being serious with their answers, not those who were obviously being sarcastic)
i know i'm a guy and for girls it's different with weight, but i only go by body fat percentage. i find it to be the best to use. i know girls are allowed a higher percentage than guys (i guess guess girls have boobs and usually more curves).
Jenzie I agree with Etienne like I was reading the comments to this blog and I couldn't take any of them seriously tbh. Anyways like what Etienne said the number on the scale doesn't matter because first of all "muscle" weighs more then 'fat" like when I was in grade 9 about 5 years ago roughly I was less then 100 pounds at 5'6" maybe I was a bit shorter I don't remember really but I ended up going into horseback riding and gaining a whole bunch of muscle and ended up becoming about 20 pounds heavier. Now I'm 140 so I'm trying to lose a bit of the weight since it isn't all muscle anymore, but according to my BMI stats I'm at a healthy weight for my age and height and that's all that should matter. Your health should come first like I may not be as skinny as the girls that walk down the runway modeling but if I really wanted to I could I just choose not too because I like who I am.
Banjodonaam LOL I'm 5'6" and that's actually pretty tall in Canada most girls that I know are about a head shorter then me it seems like 5'1" to 5'3"
