God- Tier Winners (No Real Noticeable Flaws)
1- Danni- Flipped a huge majority against itself with one challenge win, played an amazing game despite well hidden.
2- Kim- Perfect control, had every convinced she was an easy beat and won the bitter jury over.
3- Natalie White- Perfected the strategy of being everyone's friend. The Erik move, Gaulu trying to draw rocks PROTECTING her, and her strong social game put her here.
4- Tina- The first female winner, taking best of a hero and villians game together.
Amazing Winners (1 or 2 small flaws at best)
5- Chris- Minority winner, but his revenge schemes almost killed him, one of the best FTC preformances ever.
6- Natalie Anderson- Great player, made the right moves and took big risks toward the end.
7- Denise- Survived every tribal council
8- Sandra Pearl Islands- Was able to keep herself open and postioned herself to be in a postion where she could sit next to her easiet oppenet to beat
9- Todd- Giving James 2 idols was dumb af, but he fixed it. Lead one of the smartest cults ever though.
10- Richard Hatch- The orginal winner, but overall played a simple game
Great Winners (Solid strong games, but noticeable flaws/luck elemtents)
11- Sophie- The lesser of 3 evils woman. She kept people from flipping and kept everything locked down with very paronid players on her side. Great FTC prefromance.
12- Amber- The good cop game of hers is massively underrated, as it worked to a charm.
13- J.T.- Never should have made finals, yet did so near effortlessly
Good Winners (Noticable knocks against them)
14- Jeremy- Same as above. he got into a 2 clique and he convinced people to let him stay much longer then he should have. Although in and out of control, he played a very solid game winning a crucial immunity that propelled him to his win. Biggest Flaws: Sitting next to two of the easiest people to beat in Survivor History, Clothse line Idol, F6 tribal behavivor.
15- Jenna- The orginal Challenge run winner. Played a solid game with some semblance of stratgeies, while not a perfect game, she had a clear cut strategy. Biggest Knock: Her average at best social game.
16- Vecepia- Showed that anyone can win this game and saved survivor. Pagoging where not final. Biggest Knock: Neleh's horrid FTC, just still madly bitter by how she handle F3.
17- Brian- lead the Orginal cult of dumbassess. Took most unlikeable player. Biggest Knock: That most of the jury regrets there votes, madly unlikeable, and overall even being kneck and neck with clay coming in is bad.
Just There Winners( Nothing particually Good or Bad about them, there just there)
18- Aras- Decent in all aspects of the game, but never had an outsanding moment. Targeted by minority a lot and with Terry's idol was dangerous..
19- Tyson- Lead an alliance, couldn't keep the bottom under control like most people above him, being a major flaw. Also Monica's PLETHORA of money really hurt her chances.
20- Ethan- The orginal strategy of go to the end with someone less likeable. Although Lex was 3rd, he simply didn't piss anyone off as much as Kim and overall was the first likeable winner. Again did nothing noteworthy imo.
21- Tom- Not likeable toward superfans but that is irrelvent. He overall again simply manged to be on a tribe where he was always safe, and overall, never had to struggle. his only real moment was when Caryn and Katie dropped the ball and that was a big ball drap. Also Ian handing the win to Tom is kinda disgusting what he did.
22- Sandra, HvV- Used the play to the jury strategy. Perfectly acceptable but her game has large points where she is to busy targeteing her easiest wins.
God Idol Winners (Winners having the God Idol making them difficult to rank)
23- Tony- Solid player who legitmily never could be taken out. On a season with mostly competent players, It puts him above Yul.
24- Yul- Same as above however people knew about his, and he was legit immune all game, it really puts Yul in a seprate cargory as his game so different.
Meh Winners (Some Factor that makes them just meh)
25- Boston Rob- 4th time out there. Too much luck in his end-game.
26- Earl- Overally most boring least memorable winner. Don't really rember his game much, and that hurt him in my ranking.
Bad Winners-( HEAVILY lacking at least one element of the game, for most Stratgey is almost non-exsitant)
27- Fabio- His strategy was to be a goof ball. Overall just likeable immunity runner, but is lacking a solid strategic game
28- Mike- Fucked up and put himself higher on the hitlist then needed. Immunity run was impressive but overall his social game was average at best, and his strategic game was almost passable but still not.
Playing To Lose (Winners whose Stratgey would have lost them the game if not due to outside influence)
29- Parvarti- Solid game and amazing player, but her biggest flaw and most damaging is spencing all game playing to a Final 3 where she is NEVER in any universe winning. Be it an Amanda or Cirie win, Parvarti is not winning and to me, as her strategy aws playing to LOSE Survivor, she is knocked down to the bottom with Bob!
30- Bob- The Onion Allaince, and Sugar being a psycho nuff said.
Production's Biggest and Most Obvius Riggae:
31- Cochran- At least in Cambodia and RI the production pets COULD have conveviably lost but there is NO universe where Cochran does not win Crapmoan and that is an awful, awful thing to think about. UGhhh!
manalord lol your knock on jeremy was that spencer and tasha were easy to beat but there were many situations where either could have won. Both spencer and tasha played great games so saying they were easy to beat would only be because jeremy was so great. You tell me that they were easier to beat than Cassandra/dreamz, dawn/sherri, Phillip/Natalie, etc. Calling spencer and tasha goats is just false lol
Adamsel actuall yas Cassandrea is well spoken, Sherri stoped giving a fuck, Natalie legit had to say she rode coattails to win off a bitter jury and would have won.. they where that desperate to not vote BROB. Spencer is a pompus, conceited little douchebag that talked down to everyone the entire game and was entitled af so he wasn't winning a jur vote. he backstabbed almost everyone and people where pretty sore. Trasha is all those things 10fold ontop of having no real move to all her own!
manalordrobulusjgreisonne doesn't matter what the vote was. A goat is someone you bring to the end, knowing they'll get no votes. Natalie is a goat. Phillip is a goat. Sherri is a goat. Spencer and Tasha against different people could have easily won the game and therefor they weren't a goat. Yes, they didn't get any votes but that doesn't mean Jeremy knew bringing them he would get that. And even if he did, why is that a con? I agree jeremy wasn't the best but if the reason you ranked him lower was because he brought Spencer and Tasha to the end thats bs.
@admesl Trasha wouldn't beat anyone in a vote. Trasha would lose to a paper bag and Probst's used Dildo. Except it. NO ONE LIKES TRASHA. THERE IS A REASON for it... Spencer could possibly beat ummm................................... Keith and ummm.................. Keith... I'm blanking. I think you undersitamte how HATED SPencer and Trasha where on the island.
manalordrobulusjgreisonne YOU GUYS ARE LOOKING AT RESULTS. THATS NOT WHAT A GOAT IS. A goat is someone who someone brings along because they know they have no chance at winning. Saying that Tasha and Spencer are the biggest goats ever is just false. Yes, tasha probably had no chance of winning so she was a goat. But against the right people she COULD have won. Abi vs. Tasha vs. Keith Tasha is for sure the winner.
Spencer could have won or at least got some votes if he owned up to his game. When Jeremy took Spencer he wasn't saying "spencer has 0.0 chance of winning" and thats what a goat is. Spencer had a chance at votes and lost them in answering questions.
Jeremy was way better than Spencer or Tasha but that doesn't make either of them goats nor does that make Jeremy any less of a great winner
manalordrobulusjgreisonne Natalie Tenerelli, no chance at winning Red. I in any circumstance, Sherri no chance in any circumstance, Dreamz, no chance in any circumstance, Katie from Palau, no chance in any circumstance, Will Sims, no chance in any circumstance. TASHA AND SPENCER HAD A CHANCE IN AT LEAST A FEW CIRCUMSTANCES EACH.
Abi and Keith beat Spencer and Tasha. You really don't seem to know how much they were hated ro at least were blinded by the edit.
And no, Spencer would not have got votes if he "owned up to his game," the jury saw the arrogant entitled rich brat he was and justly gave him 0 votes because of it :)
@damsel Spencer could have won had he not been so obvisly fake and condecding. The jury was praying he wasn't so they COULD vote for him, Spencer was an easy win because hes no capable of surpassing what he needed to do to have a prayer to win in any scenario.
Also LMAO Abi has a SOLID shot to beat Trasha, but Keith wins that F3 easily and handily.
how does that make no sense? at lets say the final 10, take any combination and who wins more, a combination of Natalie or Phillip in Red. I or a combination of Tasha or Spencer in Cambodia
adamsel NONE OF THESE FOUR CAN WIN IN ANY JURY CONFIGURATION WITH THERE SKILLSETS. ALL OF THEM NEED TO GO OUTSIDE THERE CHARCTERS TO WIN THE JURY VOTE, AND MOST CAN ONLY DO IT IN THE FINAL 3 THEY MADE. SO LIKE..... I DONT GET WHATS SO HARD TO UNDERSTAND ABOUT THIS.. THERE BOTH EQUALLY AWFUL GOATS BUT REALISTICLLY NATALIE T. HAD THE MOST CHANCE TO WIN AS THE JURY WAS DESPERATE FOR A REASON NOT TO VOTE BROB!
I don't get your issue with Parvati. Amanda wasn't getting more than 3 votes, so there's no way she could have won. Either Parvati would win, Cirie would win, or either of them could tie with Amanda. But 3 votes wouldn't win.
I don't get your issue with Parvati. Amanda wasn't getting more than 3 votes, so there's no way she could have won. Either Parvati would win, Cirie would win, or either of them could tie with Amanda. But 3 votes wouldn't win.
I don't get your issue with Parvati. Amanda wasn't getting more than 3 votes, so there's no way she could have won. Either Parvati would win, Cirie would win, or either of them could tie with Amanda. But 3 votes wouldn't win.
Mattiam incorrect. Parvarti ends with 1 or 2 votes. Eliza and Natalie where very vocal about supporting Cirie, so they would vote for her, and Cirie also would not longer be a vote. Jaison either votes for Cirie making the vote 3-3-1 OR he votes Parv still.
Erik also could vote for Cirie but its unlikely. More then likely Amanda or Cirie wins Parv isn't getting more then 2 votes!
