I think you should leave it how it is.
Sent by sharkskin, on Jan 22, 2010
Don't fuck wiff somethang dat ain't broken bitch.
Sent by sharkskin, on Jan 22, 2010
how about nomination is still the same but eviction will be changed like if a nommed active player who did the challenge vs a nommed inactive player who did not challenge before day change, automatically the inactive is voted out, votes submitted of the players will be disregarded even though the active player has the most no. of votes. :), long explanation. LOL.
additional. LOL. please be considerate to students and working people who can only log on at the end of the day during weekdays like me. hehehe. during mornings, i can't be that active bec im working 8-9 hours. so after office (already night)i can log on to do the challenge and talk with other players. :). hope nominations wont be changed coz there's a chance i'll be nommed during mornings although i did good in the challenge for example. it's better to change the way of evicting players like what i've said above :D
how will this help?
the inactives will get nominated for not doing the challenges or with the new change being inactive anyways...and if your trying to get the game more active itll just be the people that understand what they are doing spamming against the innactives that get carried through regardless and the somewhat inactives/noobs
yay does this make is more like rookies?? I havent been here since it was different...so nominations will be based on activity too, am I understanding this right? Yay this is good news if so!! hehe
Ugh, I like social castings, but now this just gives me more of a reason to leave the site completely because I work full time and can't be here to play games as much as I want.
Im sure as you can see clearly the active players like to play rookies as they can be competitive inside them and win .... while the Less active players stick to such games like castings and survivor due to the FAIR amount of activeness it takes to get a good bonus and be on for every challenge. People like me that are at school all day and with a sport which some days I get really home late (and same scenario with people with jobs) cant even compete in rookies as they would like a fair chance to win. Now this site is awesome and i love to compete and keep up my newly added rank. So most people join games to keep a manageable day change for me like 9-10 so they can still join and have a chance to win games. Most people with a long streak of recent castings games usually have survivor going along with. Im sure people would love to join two survivor games (because its the best) but with the merge system it cant happen so they usually have a casting in the other spot so they can play to win in two games at once. Also once their merge streak ends they have to stick to castings and blogging i guess to get reasonable health back to join another survivor. If there not active thatll never happen.
That long ramble all sums up why the castings shouldnt change
thank you
If I have to chat more, I'm probably going to have to play less. If there is another way to stop people carrying dead players to the end then that would be better. I think mawj_21 had a great suggestion! Tengaged is already really cliquey and biased against newer players. I don't know how to change that...
Also I was just thinking - what about the people who join here who don't speak English very well? i know there are different versions of Tengaged in other languages, but they still join here. At the moment I'm in a game with people from Italy, Spanish, and a Czeck (can't spell that sorry!).
OMG How about instead of messing with castings 24/7 LEAVE IT ALONE and Start putting challenges in rookies and stop the random bewteen top 3 people which is dumb as shit.
leave castings ALONE.
If you guys make it active based then I can't play here anymore.... I don't have time to look at a screen 24/7.... I do have a life..... The system you have now works fine
