TO RANDOMIZE: Castings games are the first step to reaching ultimate stardom right? Well, you may or may not agree with me but putting in challenges made them Anti-Social. Some people just log on, do their challenge and vote, then log off. I think challenges in castings can be fun, but make the game itself more anti-social. Also, the number of inactives in casting have gone up. It would be better if we could do this:
Day 1-5: The least inactive and the person with the most votes are evicted.
Day 6-12 The person with the most votes
I'm not saying that you should change castings right away or something like that, but rather just put that idea in your head because after all this is a "Social Reality Site"
COMMENT YOUR IDEAS, AND PLUS SO RANDOMIZE SEES IT.
These type of blogs have been put up a lot. :P
So yeah Mr. Randomize should back the Algo!
First it looks for inactives (2 days inactivity) and then goes on the votes.
[10x+]
plussed. :D
you have a good point re this one but people have a choice if they want to be active, say they talk a lot in a game. If some people just log on, do their challenge and vote, then log off, it's their choice BUT it doesn't help them to become a 'good communicator', meaning, if that's their gamestyle, it will be hard for them to win rookies and stars.
casting is a preparation for all the games in tengaged ("challenges" for survivor, "communication" for rookies, stars, and survivor as well. :D )
+8, I agree. The reason why these were put in was to get rid of people being unfairly algo'd in 9th, 7th, and 5th place simply because the algo didn't have many people to choose from. But now they make inactives get to the very end =/
I mean, I like being the fact that you don't have to be active, but I do agree that some sort of inactive elimination needs to added.
The inactive newbies eventually transfer to Rookies.
They never post anything & just become the algo nomination every time.
