Especially UNANIMOUSLY after being a complete punk during jury questioning. Everything Hannah said during their back & forth was true. Adam thought Hannah's moves were bad bcos they didn't benefit him most. When what she did was keep the people who were most loyal to her around. & he was deff giving himself way more credit than what's real. It's a shame the jury didn't buy anything Hannah was selling, bcos it was facts. She said she's the reason most of them are sitting there.. TRUE. Even watching Adam & Hannah respond to questioning, & their back & forthness, I don't see HOW the jury didn't see Adam was trying waaay too hard & amping himself up waaay to much. He LITERALLY came off like a punk & could not shut his mouth. Adam wasn't a bad player, by any means, but he did NOT control the game. I do think he had a great game dynamic, & was surprised people didn't take him out sooner cos they should have, but Ken should have won last night. David was his bitch; Ken controlled the game & was never in trouble yet always a threat to win. I think jury was lame & thought Ken had an "easy ride" & didn't have to do much & so he didn't deserve it but that's why he DID. Not Adam who got played out almost every tribal & not Hannah who flipped & flopped, but Ken bcos he actually slayed
I agree that Hannah didn't get enough (or really) any credit for getting out whoever she wanted... it was just construed as flip flopping and juries generally don't respect that even if she was making the best moves for her game.
That's why Ken was the obvious choice bambinoswag.
Hannah & Adam were just griping eachother's games, making them look so undeserving while the whole time while Ken sat silently & had nothing bad said about his game.
Skyler_TW I agree with you but as Adam said, Ken would have probably won on an earlier season... flashy games garner more attention. I personally think all 3 deserved to win.
