For one of the finale challenges, I have to blog why my opponents shouldn't win. I apologize in advance if I hurt anyone's feelings. So here's my analysis of each player on why they shouldn't win.
Mitch : I think he just sat back and did nothing all game. He did the challenge, but never did really well on any of them. I had to remind him to do the blog challenge, which just shows that he wasn't really paying attention to the game the whole time. He didn't play a dominant role in any of the games nor had any impact during game changing decisions. That is why Mitch shouldn't win.
Kris : I think Kris shouldn't win for a couple reasons. In the beginning, being that she's a friend of mine, I kept reminding her to do the challenges. Even though she did decently well on the challenges she participated, she missed a lot of the beginning and just recently started doing the challenges. Kris is a great person, but I don't think she's Tengaged Best Game Player.
Conman : This is the hardest one to say because him and I both gave every competition our all. He did reasonably well on all challenges, but never really had a commanding win in any challenges. He almost took control of one of the challenges, but then he's greed caught up to him and knocked him out of the running. He's a GREAT player, but not the BEST player.
I apologize if I hurt anyone's feelings. I really am not one to speak ill of people but I had to do it for the challenge. Good Luck in the finals guys, I think it'll be a really close decision.