1. In episode 2, Aubry's edgic was INV, meaning she was invisible and not shown on screen for the entire episode. She had no spoken lines, no confessionals, and as a general rule, any episode of INV content rules you out as a winner. I'm not sure who the last INV winner was, I think it might have been Tina in Episode 1? It just doesn't happen.
2. Michele is boring as hell. There is no way she would be deserving of this many confessionals if she didn't wind up winning the season. We are constantly told about Michele's social skills, and I don't think we would be if she was a runner-up, it just wouldn't make sense.
3. Michele's edit is very Danni Boatwright in a way, which is why Aubry might be on S34 on a tribe of people who were "robbed" fighting against Danni on the winning tribe. I know this is a stretch, but they put Stephen and Joe on Cambodia for that purpose.
4. Exit interviews do not seem to be in Aubry's favor. A lot of contestants were surprised that Aubry was such a mastermind in the edit after they saw their boot episodes. This is not a good sign for Aubry. They've clearly highlighted the reason Michele wins, but never specifically labeled Aubry a mastermind.
5. Yes. Aubry does have Neal and Joe locked as votes. But Michele has Nick and Julia, and I do not think it's a stretch to say that she can pull votes from Scot and Jason (they'll vote as a pair) and Debbie, who always liked Michele. I think Debbie will be key, and will be swayed to vote Michele because ultimately, social game will trump strategic game in this season.
I could be very wrong, but everything about this season indicates a Michele Fitzgerald win tonight. We'll see!!!
Comments
I predicted Michele winning after Episode 5, once she took on Anna's edit.
It's obvious that she is winning. Extremely obvious.
It's obvious that she is winning. Extremely obvious.
Good blogs.