do you really think someone who was nominated 5 times deserves to win over someone who went unnominated?? and im not throwing shade or anything I just seriously wanna know the logic. Maybe had he played a better game at the beginning he wouldn’t be in this situation.
Comments
People love a good underdog story. They’re more likely to save the person who keeps going up for whatever reason
How do you define someone deserves to win? I’m a game like stars, you win the game by having the public’s support. If you really think about it, the public is most AWARE of someone who has been nominated & survived the most times, and if a voter doesn’t have a relationship with anyone in the last poll, statistically they’re just going to vote for the person they recognize most.
Making it to the end without getting nominated is impressive but there’s no set jury (or a jury of eliminated players who have a better understanding of your journey) to award that - it’s the mass majority who will likely just vote the person they’re most familiar with
This is what typical happens when you create a flavor. I don’t think anyone else can really say who played and didn’t play a better game, as there are different ways to do so. And from my I’m understanding Owen told you all not to do that, but you still did, so to me that’s playing the game if you ask me, he said what he could to try and stay off the block the rest was really out of his control. He had to rely on the tg public to save him, and he’s done that thus far…
