1. Not all jury members will vote out of spite. Guys, are we really all that immature. I think that just because a few big names on this site may vote out of anger, I think many of us will take the vote seriously and impartially. If you are one of these people, I invite you to join this group and show your support for fair Jury voting : http://www.tengaged.com/group/1152
2. No more free finish for inactives - No longer will people need to keep inactives for the automatic 4th place. This means that there is a much less reason to keep total inactives till the very end. This is good.
3. More of a Social Game- Although pov is not based on activity, activity is important for more than HoH. To garner the votes at the end, people will need to play a great social game. This is good.
4. Change is good- A new rookies will bring back excitement to what was a dying game. Now, rookies will return to the forefront of Tengaged and may even bring some retired vets back.
Now I am not saying the game will work, but here a a few reasons it just might:
I think we should make another separate game that has a jury and challenges for PoV. Any other Rookies changes ideas can go to the other game. We can call it a different name too. Then we keep the Rookies based on activity and that has no jury. Sound good? Sound fair? Thoughts? I think it's a good idea cause people love the original so much and some love new updates.
What connor said.
But ya, though I'm worried about my betting and now I'm pretty sure i'll never get a pov...it'll be cool overall to try somethin different
