of survivor winners of the 21 seasons i've watched, feel free to tell me how wrong I am in the comments unless you're bitching that Cochran and his premade Twitter alliance should be higher.
#21 Bob Crowley
#20 Fabio Birza
#19 Earl Cole
#18 John Cochran
#17 Tyson Apostol
#16 Natalie White
#15 Tom Westman
#14 J.T. Thomas
#13 Aras Baskauskas
#12 Danni Boatwright
#11 Sophie Clarke
#10 Natalie Anderson
#9 Yul Kwon
#8 Todd Herzog
#7 Parvati Shallow
#6 Sandra Diaz-Twine
#5 Denise Stapley
#4 Tony Vlachos
#3 Chris Daugherty
#2 Rob Mariano
#1 Kim Spradlin
Love Fabio and his game, he played a sort of "go with the flow" but I loved his ability to go out there and pretend to be a surfer dude, when really he's pretty analytical.
Earl was just awesome in Fiji. Going to the location like a day before and having never seen the show before, he aced it.
jacksonjoseph99 if you look at Redemption Island there's no way he should have made it as far as he did and the fact that he did means he played a pretty incredible individual game. Also you know I like Tony, he played fantastically.
skydog34 I don't understand the question so probably not.
01Gohan Earl shouldn't have even won Fiji, Cassandra thought it was a F2 and was counting on Dreamz winning and taking her where she'd slaughter him. Also the fact that Bob won was a joke, Susie should have. Randy only voted for Bob because Corinne begged him to, he was originally voting Susie.
aquamarine i mean in the context of their seasons as a whole, how would you rank the winners
so for example, since boston rob was literally handed redemption island (that cast was dead awful and russell was a dead man walking), he would be last
and then for a season as fantastic as lets say san juan del sur, where the situation changed every week and it went from natalie being at the very bottom due to her number one being ousted to her controlling the game and being one near vote from being booted, but pulling it out and destroying the jury vote, would be high up
also these rankings are always pointless
i'm assuming you're ranking by gameplay and not by character, considering kim spradlin is at the top
even in that case, your opinion is that dominant controlling gameplay is objectively better than any other type of gameplay when in reality there's no way of comparing the two. honestly the only way i can think of ranking winners by gameplay is judging who has the most repeatable gameplay i.e. who would win the most times if you put them into a simulation of 100 random seasons, and by that metric it would be someone like bob crowley or vecepia who would come out on top
well yeah i'm not saying that
in an ideal world cassandra wins, but i can't knock earl's gameplay at all. he has to be the most underrated winner at this point in survivor
considering natalie/vecepia/sophie have pretty big internet fanbases to defend them now
but i feel bad for earl bc no one ever feels strongly about him when in reality he's probably one of the best male winners the show has ever had
EXCUSE ME