This site uses cookies. If you continue to browse the site, we shall assume that you accept the use of cookies.
Big Brother and online Hunger games.

ROYALITY RIGHTS FOR ITEM DESIGNERS AND FLAWED AUCTIONING SYSTEM REWARDS

May 29, 2009 by Babyfacer
image+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
In Regards to REVENUE to the Design Maker! 
I think it's extremely INSANE for all designes that are Auctioned off and have a high bid....that the only profit they make is the STARTING BIG (per Design Labs Help page)
Note: I am aware of the indirect indication as you become an more established seller and make more items that are auctioned, the starting bid increases thereforth you the Design Maker gets more T$ revenue.
BUT THIS IS MY PROBELM AND ESPECIALLY WITH SOME SELLER'S INTIAL FIRST DESIGN THAT GO TO AUCTION(!!) IS THIS:
Why should an Designer make a kick butt Avatar Item to only make (on Average 5T$) in their initial Auction sells? I would rather if I created some very good like this, I would rather it not sell at all, me keep the item, and not earn the measily 5 T$
My Suggestion is that, the Item Designer makes the final sale price, or a perecntage of, or the final sale minus a fixed predetermined fee (like sellter fees on Ebay) for Tengaged's conveniue and clear out some of the Tengaged T$ Cash flow/inflation.
CONCLUSION: I THINK IT IS EXTREMELY UNFAIR FOR ANY ITEM DESIGNER TO MAKE A MEASILY 5 OR SO T$ IN THEIR FIRST INITAL AUCTIONS REGARDLESS OF HOW GOOD THE ITEM IS ESPECIALLY WHEN SOME TIMES ARE SUPER TIMES BETTER THAN OTHERS AND MORE QUALITY WORK/ORIGINAL.....
I THINK THE ITEM DESIGNER SHOULD GET REWARDED BASED ON HOW WELL THE ITEM SELLS, PERIOD!!
Keep in mind, as more and more items are introduced/auction become available, ORIGINALITY will greatly deminished and LESS QUALITY ITEMS WILL ENTER THE AUCTION MARKET IF USERS ARE NOT GETTING WELL REWARDED FOR THEIR ARTWORK TIME/QUALITY OF WORK!!
Please post your comments on this, and if anyone has anyway of letting Randomize see this, please do so!!!

Leave a comment