My karma is seriously high and I've only played 60 games. I honestly just got lucky in fastings and castings, but when I play the other ones they vote me out because of my record, they don't really read the list. LOL So if anyone can help me with a charity crookies please message me here or mail me. I'M ON A MISSION!!
You must be a sad fucking individual if you take the time out of your busy fucking day(like it's so busy) to ruin fucking charities. If you didn't have the goof troop with you, you wouldn't have even lasted that long . YOU ARE A CUNT. . .and every game we are in I promise you will get voted, check out my record ho. . . .happy hunting. . .GET A LIFE . . .OH YEA . . .please report that I'm a multi. PLEASE????? I'd like you to get banned for falsely accusing me.
@Jennifferr
TheSexiestDude990 dun worry about it, jennifferr is obviously a 50 year old guy with saggy balls.
If you take the time out of your day to ruin a charity, @TheSexiestDude1990 just be greatful you're on their brain so damn much, fucking assholes. I'm bout fed up with this shit, talk so tough on chat but if I was in your face would be a TOTALLY different story.
Contradictory to what most people are being told by the media and many websites, the Mayans never predicted, prophesized or said that the end of their calendar meant the end of the world. The end of their calendar did have a very important significance though.
The Science Behind It
The believed “End Of The World” date is when one of the Mayan calendars ,called the Long Count Calendar, finishes in December 21st -23rd 2012. The cycle of this calendar began August 13th 3114 BC (0.0.0.0.1.) and ends its thirteenth Baktun in December 21st – 23rd 2012 (13.0.0.0.0) giving it an age of around 5,126 years old.
Their calendar is extremely accurate, even more accurate then the calendar system we use today. Some worry that if this calendar, which has proven itself to be astronomically precise over millions of years, stops in 2012 then history itself will stop. However, this Mayan calendar does not stop in 2012; it renews and starts at 0.0.0.0.1 again.
The date of its renewal coincides with a winter solstice where the sun will align with the center of the Milky Way for the first time in 26,000 years. Others say that this galactic alignment will cause catastrophic changes to our earth and thus the end of the calendar predicts the end of the world. As of now there isn’t any scientific proof that the galactic alignment will cause any type of damage to earth.
A lot of the hype about the end of the world being on December 21st -23rd 2012 came from a book called “The Maya” which was published in 1966. In the book, the author wrote:
“There is a suggestion . . . that Armageddon would overtake the degenerate peoples of the world and all creation on the final day of the thirteenth [baktun]. Thus … our present universe … [would] be annihilated on December 23, 2012, when the Great Cycle of the Long Count reaches completion”
Yet, academic research on the Mayans doesn’t show any sign that their civilization attached apocalyptic significance to 2012. On the contrary the end of their calendar was celebrated.
For them, the galactic alignment was an anticipated event that meant the starting of a new era where the world will be reborn again. Interestingly the beginning of the long count calendar occurred when mankind began writing, and the first cities and nations appeared. What could the beginning of the next long count calendar hold for us?
Should we worry
Not really unless you still believe that the end of the calendar means the end of the world.
Worst case scenario
Scientists could find out that the galactic alignment could cause major changes to the earth, setting off a series of natural disasters.
Best case scenario
The beginning of the new cycle could coincide with great advancements in our civilizations.
Advice
Don’t believe all the hype from the media about the Mayan calendar and if you’re worried then do some research yourself to see that there really isn’t anything to worry about.
Theories are analytical tools for understanding, explaining, and making predictions about a given subject matter. There are theories in many and varied fields of study, including the arts and sciences. A formal theory is syntactic in nature and is only meaningful when given a semantic component by applying it to some content (i.e. facts and relationships of the actual historical world as it is unfolding). Theories in various fields of study are expressed in natural language, but are always constructed in such a way that their general form is identical to a theory as it is expressed in the formal language of mathematical logic. Theories may be expressed mathematically, symbolically, or in common language, but are generally expected to follow principles of rational thought or logic.
Theory is constructed of a set of sentences which consist entirely of true statements about the subject matter under consideration. However, the truth of any one of these statements is always relative to the whole theory. Therefore the same statement may be true with respect to one theory, and not true with respect to another. This is, in ordinary language, where statements such as "He is a terrible person" cannot be judged to be true or false without reference to some interpretation of who "He" is and for that matter what a "terrible person" is under the theory.[10]
Sometimes two theories have exactly the same explanatory power because they make the same predictions. A pair of such theories is called indistinguishable, and the choice between them reduces to convenience or philosophical preference.
The form of theories is studied formally in mathematical logic, especially in model theory. When theories are studied in mathematics, they are usually expressed in some formal language and their statements are closed under application of certain procedures called rules of inference. A special case of this, an axiomatic theory, consists of axioms (or axiom schemata) and rules of inference. A theorem is a statement that can be derived from those axioms by application of these rules of inference. Theories used in applications are abstractions of observed phenomena and the resulting theorems provide solutions to real-world problems. Obvious examples include arithmetic (abstracting concepts of number), geometry (concepts of space), and probability (concepts of randomness and likelihood).
Gödel's incompleteness theorem shows that no consistent, recursively enumerable theory (that is, one whose theorems form a recursively enumerable set) in which the concept of natural numbers can be expressed, can include all true statements about them. As a result, some domains of knowledge cannot be formalized, accurately and completely, as mathematical theories. (Here, formalizing accurately and completely means that all true propositions—and only true propositions—are derivable within the mathematical system.) This limitation, however, in no way precludes the construction of mathematical theories that formalize large bodies of scientific knowledge.
