This is something that always drives me nuts. I was just in a game and there was an alliance of 5, and then just me. Everyone else was inactive. On what fuckingn planet am I a threat? If you have the CLEAR majority and keep around Inactives as "strategy" then you're either
- retarded
- don't understand mathematics
- an asshole
The LOGIC isn't there- you clearly have the numbers, why not make the game fast and keep people who WANT to play?
Keeping Inactives only makes sense when you DONT have a majority of the numbers, you fucking idiotic pussies.
jayjet pumadidas @bbaddicted TR1364
Comments
And now they're negging me because they know I'm right lmao
Lmao at how you got your friends to defend your retarded mathematics skills. 5 on 1 means the 1 isn't a threat, period. Also, my KPG ratio is really good so I AM good at getting in the majority
dannny please explain to me using MATH how keeping Inactives over one active when your alliance controls 5 of the 6 active votes is "good gameplay" or "strategic"
Lejd please explain to me using MATH how keeping Inactives over one active when your alliance controls 5 of the 6 active votes is "good gameplay" or "strategic"
jayjet dannny please explain to me using MATH how keeping Inactives over one active when your alliance controls 5 of the 6 active votes is "good gameplay" or "strategic"
dogreader please explain to me using MATH how keeping Inactives over one active when your alliance controls 5 of the 6 active votes is "good gameplay" or "strategic"
I hope someone answers me because I never knew "playing the game" and "not understanding mathematics" we're synonyms until i read the autistic comments on this blog!
Violleta, I actually had no problem with you. Unfortunately you came to me and it was already too late. We already had a group ready. You said you had no one, and I was down to help you get farther but in this game you never know who is with who. There were other actives playing and we did not know if you had anything going on with them. So to play it safe, we had to let you go.
pumadidas I know it wasn't personal, you seem like a nice guy. But again, your tribute to me was absolutely 100% ILLOGICAL. How was I a "threat" to your alliance of FIVE when I was ONE vote? I just don't understand the logic there. Even with the other on-and-off actives, I still could have never gotten 5 votes together.
By the way, I figured out your five some totally on my own, nobody told me. :P Intuition I guess.
pumadidas but you guys had a solid five and I was the ONLY other consistent active -_- golly talk about paranoid! The only ally I could have possibly had was Donny, oh wait he was out first
Lust__ stop being so dramatic over this big brother site, youve never even met me. I bet you have no attention from the opposite sex given how retarded you act, yikes.