if Nicole makes it to final two with no respect for her game I'll be livid. She could go completely unnominated and lose, and that is absolutely ridiculous. I dont care if you like her, she's played a perfect game thus far and I'm sick of seeing people discredit her.
and i ain't watching this season, but i do agree she should get some praise for her strategical game. if she doesn't win, however, that's entirely her fault.
aquamarine but big brother is primarily a social game where the only objective is to win is by getting the votes of the jury so as strategic as you are if someone doesnt get any jury votes it shows they ignored the most important aspect of the game
>i believe nicole is playing a great game, if she makes finals she deserves to win... or Paul... probably paul over her, feel like he's played an amazing game and had to overcome much more than her.
the one thing i don't respect about nicole's game is that she seemed content with the plan for final 6 with the 5 guys, which I think we can all agree would've been a dumb fucking idea for her, and good for paul/victor/corey/paulie
James and Paul basically saved her from herself, against her will. If I was a juror then that would probably been my reasoning for casting a vote against her in favor of Paul and maybe Corey.
I think her game is good but her social game I think is messing her up. I mean the jury I don't think will be really bitter. I mean Day is probably going to vote for her to win because they said how they wanted to actually stay together in the game but that the trust wasn't there anymore. I mean I know Natalie said she won't vote Nicole to win, Meech probably won't but I think Nicole would get the votes. She just needs a good speech because honestly that's how you win in my opinion. I mean in past seasons the person with the better speech may have not played the better game or was liked as much can change votes with a well together speech.
However, she could still be nominated before final 2. Overall, she's playing a good game but social gaming is a huge aspect but she has a great strategy and I think she has a good social game with the guys in the house but it depends whose in jury. I mean, say if Nicole makes final 2 against Paul, the people in jury would most likely vote Paul (who is playing a pretty great game, I mean yes he has been nommed but he has been targeted and he has has played the game with a pretty great social and strategy.) I mean one can say that about Vic too, like even if you say it's not fair that he returned twice in the season, he earned those opportunities. Also the only reason they had two well three return chances is because of the fact it's 99 days like last season but is consisting of 16 houseguests rather than last season that had the twin twist (17 houseguests). Also Vic stepped up his social game when he won the first battle back and he has made big moves and also has been pretty honest as well as a comp beast.
So yes, I agree Nicole is playing a great game, but Paul and Vic are as well. And this is a strategic and factual game standpoint. Not a favorite standpoint.
Corey I can see why he'd get votes, I mean he's stated before he doesn't want to be with Nicole after the show and that could honestly gain him support from a manipulation/strategy also he has been (I hope) acting dumb because he has been talking a lot of game before Paulie left, also something this week was he said "What if Nicole sides with James in the final 3 and takes him over me" so with that said Corey isn't playing a terrible game but there could be a lot of improvements.
aquamarine but big brother is primarily a social game where the only objective is to win is by getting the votes of the jury so as strategic as you are if someone doesnt get any jury votes it shows they ignored the most important aspect of the game
Sent by splozojames50,Sep 8, 2016
