Last comment I want to make since I guess questioning is over (although I'm happy to answer any more questions if anyone has any).
I feel that I played an extremely savvy and flexible game (this is a nice way of saying backstabby and flip-floppy). I like to think of myself as self-aware. I'm not delusional or self-obsessed enough to think that I didn't piss anyone off in this season and that my style of gameplay should automatically be deserving of a jury vote. I've been in this position before (both on the receiving end as a FTC finalist and on the other end as a juror) and I've said every single time that jurors should base their vote on whatever rationale they see fit. There does not need to be any justification. The finalist who loses a particular jury vote is the only person to blame for that failure because they were not successful in their jury management in some capacity. People have said to me that I've made dumb moves (although I've tried to defend and rationalize all of my moves in my answers that I've given so far, and I feel that I've done that successfully but that's not my call to make) and if I lose those jury votes then that's completely and 100% fair. I won't bitch about it, and I will accept this loss.
That being said, I ask that you at least consider the argument that I've put to the jury. Yes, I was a flip-flopper, but I'm the only one to vote for the person who went home every single round of the postmerge (and the premerge except for 1 round where Liam idoled himself). I feel that I had my finger on the pulse of this game throughout. Some of my flips may seem illogical but from my perspective they were completely thought out and well-timed. I would not have made it to the end with such a big target on my back if I hadn't flipped when I did. People like to point out immunity as a crutch (an argument that I always hate because then there becomes a perception that winning challenges is a bad thing even though intentionally throwing a challenge you know you can win is 100x worse) but I only won immunity in 4 out of 9 rounds in which individual immunity was up for grabs. That is 5 rounds where I was vulnerable and should have been taken out. 1 of those rounds I was handed immunity by someone who should probably not have done that.
And the final thing I want to say is that I never once intended to be malicious or flip on someone out of spite in this game. I never took anything personal and I never resorted to personal attacks or OTT gameplay. I took it round by round, assessed the situation, and made my move. If anyone is hurt by me turning on them, then I genuinely am sorry for that but I am not sorry for the moves that I've made in this game and I will stand by them to the death.
GL to the other finalists and thanks all for a lively discussion.